{"id":224805,"date":"2025-03-17T11:42:40","date_gmt":"2025-03-17T15:42:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/interiordesign.net\/?post_type=id_research&p=224805"},"modified":"2025-03-17T17:59:02","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T21:59:02","slug":"interior-designs-2025-top-100-giants","status":"publish","type":"id_research","link":"https:\/\/interiordesign.net\/research\/interior-designs-2025-top-100-giants\/","title":{"rendered":"Unveiling Interior Design\u2019s 2025 Top 100 Giants"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"interior<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

March 17, 2025<\/p>\n\n\n

Words: <\/span>Interior Design Staff<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Unveiling Interior Design\u2019s 2025 Top 100 Giants<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Welcome to the first installment of our 2025 Giants coverage, in which we spotlight the industry\u2019s 200 most lucrative firms, based on their reported interior design fees. Celebrating our 48th year of Giants research\u2014and marking our sixth collaboration with sister brand ThinkLab analyzing the data\u2014this issue goes beyond the top 100 and Rising Giants rankings to include detailed charts and graphs that summarize our latest survey findings. Throughout, you\u2019ll find project features from these industry leaders exclusively, alongside a high-level perspective on the challenges and opportunities shaping their practices. For deeper sector-specific analysis, including complete rankings for hospitality, healthcare, and sustainability leaders, watch for continued Giants coverage in our upcoming June\/July issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, we begin, as always, with the pinnacle of the profession: the top 100 Giants. These prominent firms had a big year, bringing in a record-setting $6.3 billion in interior design fees, a 7 percent increase. Consider this: 2023 was the first time these firms ever crossed the $5 billion threshold, making this latest milestone a clear sign of industry vitality. Also high is the number of firms who report being \u201cvery\u201d or \u201cextremely\u201d confident in their predictions for the current calendar year, a signal of remarkable stability despite lingering economic uncertainty. Alas, for 2025, the 100 Giants are anticipating a slight decline\u2014though they typically forecast downturns that ultimately get outpaced by actual results. (Just rewind to last March\u2019s Giants issue<\/a>, in which the top 100 were bearish regarding 2024.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Top 100 Giants 2025<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> wdt_created_by<\/th> wdt_created_at<\/th> wdt_last_edited_by<\/th> wdt_last_edited_at<\/th> 2025 Rank<\/th> Firm<\/th> Headquarters<\/th> Design Fees (in millions)<\/th> Design Staff<\/th> 2024 Rank<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n Gensler<\/a><\/td>\n San Francisco<\/td>\n 937.1<\/td>\n 2,946<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n Jacobs<\/a><\/td>\n Dallas<\/td>\n 339.1<\/td>\n 1,269<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n Perkins&Will<\/a><\/td>\n Chicago<\/td>\n 335.2<\/td>\n 982<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n AECOM<\/a><\/td>\n Dallas<\/td>\n 231.8<\/td>\n 460<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n HKS<\/a><\/td>\n Dallas<\/td>\n 220.5<\/td>\n 150<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n HOK<\/a><\/td>\n St. Louis<\/td>\n 188.6<\/td>\n 339<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n Corgan<\/a><\/td>\n Dallas<\/td>\n 179.5<\/td>\n 400<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n HDR<\/a><\/td>\n Omaha, NE<\/td>\n 171.4<\/td>\n 126<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n Stantec<\/a><\/td>\n Edmonton, Canada<\/td>\n 162.4<\/td>\n 236<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n michelleyee<\/td>\n 11\/03\/2025 02:46 PM<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n CannonDesign<\/a><\/td>\n New York<\/td>\n 153.0<\/td>\n <\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>