{"id":198563,"date":"2022-07-13T09:08:05","date_gmt":"2022-07-13T13:08:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/interiordesign.net\/?post_type=id_research&p=198563"},"modified":"2022-10-25T15:09:24","modified_gmt":"2022-10-25T19:09:24","slug":"healthcare-giants-2022","status":"publish","type":"id_research","link":"https:\/\/interiordesign.net\/research\/healthcare-giants-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Healthcare Giants 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"a
Image courtesy of Adam Murphy.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

July 13, 2022<\/p>\n\n\n

\n

Healthcare Giants 2022<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

We gather here today to look back at the stabilizing effects 2021 had on the Interior Design<\/em> Healthcare Giants. But in doing so we find we just can\u2019t quit 2020. In our tracking of business trend data for the group of top 40 firms doing significant work in the healthcare arena since 2019, we have seen huge fluctuations driven by the pandemic. But within those ups and downs, we are just now beginning to see what normal business for the sector might look like. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Rankings 2022<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> 2022 Rank<\/th> Firm<\/th> HQ Location<\/th> Design Fees (in millions)<\/th> Value (in millions)<\/th> Sq. Ft. (in millions)<\/th> 2021 Rank<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n HDR<\/a><\/td>\n Omaha<\/td>\n 60.90<\/td>\n 181<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n CannonDesign<\/a><\/td>\n New York City<\/td>\n 60.00<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n Perkins&Will<\/a><\/td>\n Chicago<\/td>\n 56.40<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n Gensler<\/a><\/td>\n San Francisco<\/td>\n 50.90<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n Perkins Eastman<\/a><\/td>\n New York<\/td>\n 41.60<\/td>\n 842<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n AECOM<\/a><\/td>\n Dallas<\/td>\n 40.50<\/td>\n 789<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n HKS<\/a><\/td>\n Dallas<\/td>\n 40.20<\/td>\n 27<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n SmithGroup<\/a><\/td>\n Detroit<\/td>\n 34.20<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 11<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n HOK<\/a><\/td>\n New York<\/td>\n 33.30<\/td>\n 33<\/td>\n 29<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n HGA<\/a><\/td>\n Minneapolis<\/td>\n 28.10<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n 15<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>